Saturday, December 17, 2011

Jeans that purify the air

Tiffany O'Callaghan, CultureLab editor

1-AnaphaseDress_PrimitiveStreak_image_Justine_Model_Korinna-at-Models-1.jpg(Image: Anaphase dress by Justine)

From dissolving dresses to blue jeans that suck nitrogen oxide from the air, Helen Storey's designs are meant to be sustainable

SHE used to design titillating ensembles for Madonna. Now, more than two decades later, Helen Storey has swapped celebrity for sustainability and abandoned the runway for the lab. She designs radical garments - such as dresses that dissolve in water - to question our throwaway society. Her latest project treats jeans with a catalyst to improve air quality.

Sixteen years ago, Helen closed her high fashion shop after personal and financial problems. As the tale goes, it was a single curving question mark that ushered her into the world of science. Her sister, Kate, an embryologist funded by the Wellcome Trust, saw a flyer about a trust initiative to get scientists and artists working side by side.

"I was more bookish and perhaps more academic. Helen went down an art route. It asked us to bring those worlds together," explains Kate, now head of the division of cell and developmental biology at the University of Dundee, UK. She sent the flyer to Helen, tacking on a note with a lone question mark.

Initially, Helen was reluctant. She had attended a school where the threat of violence hung over academic achievement and was worried that this project could bring back her long-standing educational fears. But the desire for a new direction won out.

The sisters focused on designing dresses depicting and celebrating the first 1000 hours of human development. Oddly, they found themselves swapping roles. "Helen was very anxious about getting the science right, and I was concerned that these things were beautiful, otherwise no one would look at them," Kate says.

2-Erin-O'Connor-as-HERSELF_Still-from-Catalytic-Clothing-Film_credit_Adam-Mufti.jpg(Image: Adam Mufti, Catalytic Clothing Film)

Entitled Primitive Streak, after the groove-like structure through which cells pour to form the inner layers of the embryo, the collection of 27 dresses mixed realism and fantasy to produce such designs as 1000 Sperm Coat and Chromosome Kimono. The collection has toured seven countries since 1997. This year Helen added The Lung Dress - a graceful garment with gauzy spans of off-white filigree that rise up and away like wings.

After Primitive Streak, scientific curiosity took her in unexpected directions - and she finally shed her discomfort with academia. "I began to get used to picking up the phone and saying, 'Hello, you don't know me, but can you make me a so-and-so,' and not being fazed by silence or laughter."

One project, commissioned by Unilever to explore ideas inspired by its products, took Helen into supermarkets to stare at packets and bottles. She had been reading The Fabric of the Cosmos by Brian Greene, and was captivated by quantum entanglement - the idea that two particles can be inextricably linked no matter the distance between them.

The two things came together and, out of the blue, she called Tony Ryan, a chemist specialising in polymer nanotechnology at the University of Sheffield in the UK. After chatting for a while, she asked: "If two particles can talk to each other across the universe, why can't a bottle have a conversation with its contents and know when to disappear?"

"I didn't laugh," Ryan says, (though he did run down the corridor to tell colleagues). He found her unfettered thinking refreshing. "You get things from so far left field that you know you'd never get from a scientist."

Ryan figured out that it was indeed possible for a bottle to turn into something else, and the Wonderland project was born. The successful prototype was made of a water-soluble polymer. The plan was to fill a bowl with boiling water and dissolve the used bottle into a gel. In the cap, they intended to include seeds to grow a new plant out of the gel. Sadly, you won't be growing basil from an old bottle any time soon. Because their bottle looks like the polyethylene terephthalate used to make most plastic products, careless disposal could contaminate recycling.

Before the bottle project took off, the idea inspired art in the form of dissolving dresses. Ryan created a dissolving polymer that could be woven into a fabric and Helen designed the dresses. In exhibitions at the London College of Fashion - where she is now professor of fashion and science - and elsewhere, she dissolved the garments in giant bowls of water.

Thinking about alternative uses for clothing has led to their latest project. Manufacturers have long used nanoparticles of titanium dioxide in products from paint to cement to improve air quality. TiO2 is a photocatalytic compound, reacting to sunlight to turn harmful nitrogen oxide gases into harmless nitrates that can be washed away. Where TiO2 has been used on roads and buildings, NOx levels have been cut by as much as 60 per cent.

Ryan reasoned that on walls and roads, the impact of the paint is limited by surface area. What if we used the surface area of our clothes? "To a chemist, you're a perambulating catalyst support!" Ryan estimates that the surface area of clothes is about 40 square metres per kilogram.

The paint removes about 0.5 grams of nitrogen oxide per square metre per day, so if the clothes were as effective as paint, 1 kg of clothes could take out 20 g, with a pair of jeans taking 10 g. To cut 3 tonnes per day - roughly the amount needed to lower NOx to optimal levels in Sheffield - you would need some 3o0,000 people walking around in treated jeans, says Ryan.

He and Helen got a grant for Catalytic Clothing, treated their own jeans with TiO2 and set up installations of treated trousers in city centres - propped up like scarecrows' legs plodding across the grass. Nanoparticle provider Cristal Global is now working on a TiO2-based laundry product with cleaning supplies firm Ecover.

Today, conveying the wonder of science and having a tangible impact with her art are Helen's main motivations. Yet Kate also sees the gains for researchers who collaborate with her: "You take years to train to the point where you ask the cutting edge scientific question and perhaps only a few of your colleagues know how close you are to something novel and exciting. It's very nice to find ways to share that - someone like Helen can bring that to the fore."

Follow @CultureLabNS on Twitter

Like us on Facebook

Source: http://feeds.newscientist.com/c/749/f/10897/s/1afc1b8f/l/0L0Snewscientist0N0Cblogs0Cculturelab0C20A110C120Cjeans0Ethat0Epurify0Ethe0Eair0Bhtml0DDCMP0FOTC0Erss0Gnsref0Fonline0Enews/story01.htm

stacy keibler dancing with the stars season 13 cast tay sachs tay sachs watch the walking dead giuliana and bill giuliana and bill

Friday, December 16, 2011

Avatar Brings Actual Special Features to iTunes Special Features [Video]

The special features you get with iTunes' movies aren't really that special. Well, if anyone is going to do something about it, it's James Cameron. Say what you want about the guy, he's always pushing the technological envelope. More »


Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/FkwsAzvld-Y/

nigel tufnel day black friday deals molokai molokai ashton kutcher twitter sandusky barbados

House GOP unveils $1 trillion spending bill

WASHINGTON (AP) ? House Republicans have unveiled a massive $1 trillion-plus yearend spending package despite a plea from the White House for additional talks over a handful of provisions opposed by President Barack Obama.

The measure curbs agency budgets but drops many policy provisions sought by GOP conservatives.

But it contains language to roll back Obama administration policies that had loosened restrictions on the rights of Cuban immigrants to send money to relatives in Cuba or travel back to the island to visit.

The measure had been held up by Senate Democrats seeking leverage in talks on extending payroll tax cuts and unemployment insurance ? two pillars of Obama's jobs agenda.

A vote could come as early as Friday to avoid a government shutdown.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/386c25518f464186bf7a2ac026580ce7/Article_2011-12-15-Congress-Spending/id-9848687628b442ae84919fa1979826df

st. nicholas heisman finalists heisman finalists kepler 22 b kepler 22 b rosie o donnell kurt busch

Gene therapy helps counter hemophilia B

Enabling cells to make a clotting compound allows some patients to quit medication

Web edition : Tuesday, December 13th, 2011

A gene therapy based on a cargo-toting virus that gravitates to liver cells might provide hemophilia B patients with long-lasting protection against bleeding, an international team of scientists reports online December 10 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Hemophilia B is the second-most common form of hemophilia, a hereditary disorder in which blood fails to clot properly. Patients must receive preventive injections of a clotting compound called factor IX to prevent bleeding from cuts, scratches or bruises. In the new study, four of six hemophilia B patients given the gene therapy no longer need the clotting compound.

The work ?is truly a landmark study, since it is the first to achieve long-term expression of a blood protein at therapeutically relevant levels,? physician Katherine Ponder of Washington University in St. Louis, who wasn?t part of the study team, wrote in the same issue of the journal. The findings were also presented December 11 in San Diego at a meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

British researchers treated six men ages 27 to 64 with the gene therapy, an innocuous virus coupled with components that induce liver cells to make factor IX. Before the study, the men had been getting intravenous infusions of factor IX two to three times a week, says study coauthor Andrew Davidoff, a surgeon at St. Jude Children?s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tenn., where the gene therapy was designed.

Each patient received a single infusion of the therapy, called serotype-8-pseudotyped, self-complementary adenovirus-associated virus vector. Scientists have now monitored the men for nine to 20 months.

Four patients who received medium or high doses of the therapy have made enough factor IX themselves to cease getting the preventive infusions of it. Two patients who were given low doses of the gene therapy are making less. While they still need factor IX infusions, they have cut back to one every 10 to 14 days, Davidoff says.

The virus used as the delivery vehicle, known as AAV-8, was chosen in part because it is unlikely that many people receiving it would have been exposed to it and already made antibodies against it, Davidoff says. The virus also targets liver cells, which naturally make factor IX. And although AAV-8 enters a cell it doesn?t integrate with material in the nucleus, greatly reducing the risk that the therapy would interfere with normal cell function.

Because of these attributes, ?there?s a modest level of excitement? about this approach, says hematologist W. Keith Hoots of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute in Bethesda, Md., which funded the study in part. The treatment cannot be repeated in a patient, however, because the immune system would recognize AAV-8 the second time around. Even so, the approach has promise because there are dozens of other AAVs that are still untapped, Hoots says.

Two of the patients were given a brief course of steroid drugs when they showed signs of liver inflammation, but no other side effects emerged. Earlier tests in large animals had shown that this therapy could last 10 years or longer. Further testing in people is planned, Davidoff says.


Found in: Body & Brain

Source: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/336907/title/Gene_therapy_helps_counter_hemophilia_B

teleprompter ashley greene mukesh ambani mukesh ambani bob harper aapl x factor judges

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Gingrich meets with Trump, begins first ad in Iowa

Donald Trump listens at left as Republican presidential candidate former House Speaker Newt Gingrich talks to media after their meeting in New York, Monday, Dec. 5, 2011. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)

Donald Trump listens at left as Republican presidential candidate former House Speaker Newt Gingrich talks to media after their meeting in New York, Monday, Dec. 5, 2011. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)

Republican presidential candidate, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and Donald Trump talk to media after a meeting in New York, Monday, Dec. 5, 2011. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)

Republican presidential candidate, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, right, waves after meeting with Donald Trump, and talking to the media in New York, Monday, Dec. 5, 2011. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)

Republican presidential candidate, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and Donald Trump shake hands after they met and spoke to the media in New York, Monday, Dec. 5, 2011. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)

(AP) ? Surging in polls, Newt Gingrich declared confidently Monday that he plans to run a general election campaign in all 50 states should he win the Republican presidential nomination. But he also found himself defending comments he had made about poor children ? hinting at the potential troubles and new scrutiny he faces in the race.

"I do not suggest children until about 14 or 15 years of age do heavy, dangerous janitorial work," Gingrich told reporters, seeking to explain previous remarks that rivals have used to criticize him. "On the other hand, there are a number of things done to clean buildings that are not heavy or dangerous."

At issue is a remark Gingrich made last week in which he suggested that poor children as young as 9 should work at least part time cleaning their schools in order to learn about work.

The Republican said his original point had been "distorted" to make him look insensitive, and he twice tried to explain where he stood. The idea, Gingrich said, would be "to get them into the world of work, get them into the opportunity to earn money, to get them into the habit of showing up and realizing that effort is rewarded and America is all about the work ethic."

Trying to show sensitivity on the issue, Gingrich also said he had persuaded Donald Trump ? the real estate mogul with whom he met privately earlier in the day ? to mentor a group of children from New York City's poorest schools.

"I thought it was a great idea," said Trump, who hosts the reality show "Celebrity Apprentice." ''We're going to be picking 10 young wonderful children and make them 'apprenti.' We're going to have a little fun with it."

Gingrich spent the day in New York with a busy schedule of fundraisers and meetings as he looked to solidify his status at the head of the GOP pack alongside Mitt Romney in polls nationally and in Iowa, which holds the first presidential contest on Jan. 3.

The former Georgia lawmaker chose the heavily Democratic city to announce he planned to run in all 50 states ? not just traditionally Republican or swing states ? if he becomes the party nominee.

His campaign, meanwhile, debuted a new television ad in Iowa ? the first of his campaign.

"Some people say the America we know and love is a thing of the past. I don't believe that, because working together I know we can rebuild America," Gingrich says in the ad that's laden with Americana, down to the white picket fence, the Statue of Liberty and the American stars and stripes.

As the day began, Gingrich met privately with Trump, who flirted with a bid for the Republican nomination last spring.

But the candidate left without an endorsement. Trump said he would refrain from endorsing a candidate until after he hosts a televised debate in Iowa a week before that state's caucuses.

Even so, Gingrich praised Trump as a "true American icon." And Trump said he was impressed by the former House speaker's strong showing in the GOP presidential contest.

Gingrich said he would be pleased to participate in the Trump-hosted debate and dismissed criticism from rival Ron Paul that such a forum demeaned the presidency.

"This is a country that elected a peanut farmer to the presidency. This is a country that elected an actor who made two movies with a chimpanzee to the presidency," Gingrich said, referring to Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. "Donald Trump is a great showman; he's also a great businessman. I think one of the differences between my party and the other party is we actually go to people who know how to create jobs. We need to be open to new ways of doing things."

Trump has hinted he might run for president as an Independent if the Republicans nominate a candidate who can't beat President Barack Obama. Trump sidestepped questions about a potential run but said he believes Paul has "zero chance" of getting the nomination.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2011-12-05-Gingrich-Show%20of%20Force/id-0b35c02a74a4471ca083dc2d8ff96b8a

lsu football lsu football miguel cotto vs antonio margarito terminator salvation terminator salvation rockefeller center how the grinch stole christmas

Ray Rice runs Ravens over Browns 24-10

Baltimore Ravens running back Ray Rice (27) breaks free for a 30-yard run against the Cleveland Browns in the first quarter of an NFL football game on Sunday, Dec. 4, 2011, in Cleveland. Trailing the play are Browns defensive tackle Phillip Taylor (98), linebacker Chris Gocong (51) and Ravens guard Marshal Yanda (73). (AP Photo/Tony Dejak)

Baltimore Ravens running back Ray Rice (27) breaks free for a 30-yard run against the Cleveland Browns in the first quarter of an NFL football game on Sunday, Dec. 4, 2011, in Cleveland. Trailing the play are Browns defensive tackle Phillip Taylor (98), linebacker Chris Gocong (51) and Ravens guard Marshal Yanda (73). (AP Photo/Tony Dejak)

Baltimore Ravens running back Ray Rice, center, celebrates a touchdown against the Cleveland Browns with tight end Dennis Pitta (88) and fullback Vonta Leach (44) in the second quarter of an NFL football game on Sunday, Dec. 4, 2011, in Cleveland. (AP Photo/Mark Duncan)

Baltimore Ravens running back Ray Rice (27) runs through the tackle of Cleveland Browns cornerback Sheldon Brown (24) for a touchdown in the second quarter of an NFL football game on Sunday, Dec. 4, 2011, in Cleveland. (AP Photo/Mark Duncan)

Baltimore Ravens wide receiver Torrey Smith (82) runs for a 32-yard gain as Cleveland Browns cornerback Joe Haden (23) makes the tackle in the third quarter of an NFL football game in the rain on Sunday, Dec. 4, 2011, in Cleveland. (AP Photo/Amy Sancetta)

Baltimore Ravens cornerback Jimmy Smith (22) intercepts a pass intended for Cleveland Browns wide receiver Mohamed Massaquoi (11) in the second quarter of an NFL football game on Sunday, Dec. 4, 2011, in Cleveland. (AP Photo/Amy Sancetta)

(AP) ? As Ray Lewis watched from the sideline, Baltimore's other Ray ran roughshod over the Browns.

Ray Rice rushed for a career-high 204 yards, breaking loose on a game-changing 67-yarder in the third quarter, and the Ravens kept pace with Pittsburgh atop the AFC North by pounding Cleveland 24-10 on Sunday.

Rice and Ricky Williams had short touchdown runs and Lardarius Webb returned a punt 68 yards for a TD for the Ravens (9-3), who toyed with the Browns (4-8). Baltimore racked up 290 yards rushing, and were in such control that quarterback Joe Flacco took a knee three times to run out the final two minutes.

The Ravens turned to Rice on a blustery, misting day, when Flacco had trouble throwing and kicker Billy Cundiff missed a pair of field-goal attempts.

Cleveland lost for the fifth time in six games, and the banged-up Browns have just three days to prepare for the Steelers.

One play after Cleveland closed within 10-3, Rice broke the Browns' backs with his long run.

Taking the handoff from Flacco at his own 27, Rice swept left, found a seam and cut back to the middle of the field. He was able to pull away from a bunch of pursuing Browns near midfield before being pushed out of bounds at Cleveland's 5. From there, Williams carried twice, bowling in from the 1 to put the Ravens ahead 17-3.

For the third straight week, the Ravens were without Lewis, their motivational leader and star linebacker who has been slowed by a nagging toe injury. But the 5-foot-8, 212-pound Rice, who has become one of the NFL's best all-around backs, carried the load and made sure Baltimore didn't miss a beat.

The Ravens hadn't played since Thanksgiving and were out of sync at times. However, they were finally able to beat a weaker opponent following a quality win. Three times this season, they had stubbed their toe on the road following victories but despite two botched field goals, and a fumble that gave the Browns great field position, the Ravens pushed toward the playoffs.

The Browns have major problems.

Quarterback Colt McCoy finished just 17 of 35 for 192 yards and a TD. But he fell to 0-7 in his career against division opponents, and did little to convince Browns management that he should be their QB of the future. He's got four games left this season to make a favorable impression, assuming he's healthy enough to play.

McCoy injured his right knee early, came back after missing one play and took several hard shots in the second half.

After throwing a short pass in the first quarter, McCoy was hit by Ravens defensive end Arthur Jones as he backpedaled. At first, McCoy, whose white No. 12 jersey was smeared with grass stains and dirt, appeared to be seriously injured. He fell back to the turf, was treated by trainers and limped to the sideline. Backup Seneca Wallace came in for one play, but McCoy returned the next time Cleveland got the ball.

The Ravens thoroughly dominated the Browns in the first half, but led only 10-0 at the break after Cundiff missed field-goal attempts of 34 and 41 yards.

Baltimore had the ball for 18:49 and racked up 158 rushing yards on 28 carries in the opening 30 minutes. At halftime, the Ravens had 260 total yards to 93 for Cleveland. Amazingly, it was still a game at the break.

Following Cundiff's second miss to the right, Cleveland had a chance to run out the clock and escape to the locker room trailing just 7-0. But McCoy was intercepted by Jimmy Smith, who returned it to the Browns 15. The Ravens, who inexplicably stopped giving the ball to Rice in the final minutes of the first half, had to settle for Cundiff's 21-yard field goal with 13 seconds left.

Somehow, the Browns managed to hang around and cut it to 10-3 in the third on Phil Dawson's 21-yard field goal.

Flacco was stripped by Browns rookie defensive end Jabaal Sheard and Cleveland recovered. McCoy connected with a wide-open Peyton Hillis for 52 yards to the Baltimore 5. But the Browns couldn't score a TD as tight end Evan Moore let a pass from McCoy sail through his hands in the back of the end zone.

The missed opportunity was magnified moments later when Rice ran wild.

The Ravens rode Rice for their first score, taking a 7-0 lead in the second quarter on his 6-yard run. He darted through the line and found his way to the end zone, capping a 61-yard drive in which he carried seven times for 48.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/347875155d53465d95cec892aeb06419/Article_2011-12-04-FBN-Ravens-Browns/id-5ba00b438c654c1f9385bcdc33f38aee

lsu football lsu football miguel cotto vs antonio margarito terminator salvation terminator salvation rockefeller center how the grinch stole christmas

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Can Mozilla survive without Google? (Digital Trends)

Can-Mozilla-survive-without-Google

Mozilla?s Firefox browser occupies a unique place in the industry. Developed as an alternative to Microsoft?s market-dominating Internet Explorer, Mozilla is the only major Web browser on the planet that isn?t a commercial operation. Firefox aims to answer to actual Web users, rather than cow-tow to corporate goals and pursue every opportunity to capture users and (of course) make profits. And Mozilla has succeeded: the company has been operating for years and steadily eroded Microsoft?s share of the browser market to become Internet Explorer?s leading competitor.

However, just because Mozilla is a non-profit doesn?t mean all that work happens for free. It still has to pay for office space, connectivity, servers, hosting, employee salaries and benefits, plus all the other costs of a software development operation: computers, software, licensing, and (probably) the odd Nerf gun. Mozilla gets support from contributors, but the bulk of the company?s revenue comes from partnerships with search providers, which pay Mozilla the equivalent of referral fees every time someone comes to their search service through a Mozilla browser. Mozilla?s biggest source of revenue is Google, which is set up as the default search on most Firefox installations.

However, Google is also the developer of one of Firefox?s biggest competitors: Chrome. And Mozilla?s search partnership agreement with Google expired in November.

There has not yet been any formal statement from either organization about the agreement?s future, but the situation leaves one to wonder: Can Mozilla survive without Google? And does Google need Mozilla?

Mozilla?s finances

Mozilla isn?t exactly hurting for money. According to the company?s 2010 audited financial statement (PDF) the organization pulled in just over $123 million during 2010, a revenue increase of over 18 percent from 2009. However, of that $123 million in income, more than $121 million came from ?royalties,? which is the category that would encompass partnerships with search-engine companies. That?s more than 98 percent of Mozilla?s annual revenue for the year, meaning its search partnerships are essentially the lifeline of the outfit.

How much of that money was from Google? Mozilla isn?t saying, but some estimates put it around 85 percent, or over $100 million. Mozilla is quick to point out it has search agreements with a number of companies other than Google, including Bing, Yahoo, Amazon, eBay, Yandex, and ?others,? but Mozilla hasn?t broken out royalties received from individual search partnerships since 2008. Back then, its partnership with Google accounted for 88 percent of its royalty income. It?s safe to believe that proportion has changed a bit: Not only has Mozilla expanded out into new partnerships and platforms, but Microsoft?s Bing search engine wasn?t a blip on the horizon back in 2008. Now Bing is roughly even with Yahoo for a distant second place in search market share (and powering Yahoo behind the scenes), has its own partnership with Mozilla. Getting still cozier with Bing, Mozilla just launched Firefox with Bing that makes Bing the default search engine for both Firefox?s search field and so-called ?Awesome Bar.?

However, it?s safe to say that revenue from searches Mozilla brings to Google still accounts for the bulk of Mozilla?s revenue. Although Google?s deal with Mozilla has expired, Firefox downloads still have Google set as the default browser and reports say negotiations between Mozilla and Google are currently underway. It?s probably safe to assume the two will reach some sort of agreement soon.

But can Mozilla survive on a revised search agreement with Google?

Mozilla without Google

Mozilla could get along for a while without a search deal from Google. According to Mozilla?s 2010 tax filings (PDF) the organization had over $27 million in cash and investments and about $3.3 million in expenses; the organization?s consolidated financial statement claims over $105 million in investment assets. Although the situation is complicated, Mozilla could probably coast along for a few years on its existing assets if its search deal with Google were to dry up overnight.

That?s especially true considering Mozilla?s income would not drop to zero if Google went away. Mozilla still has its other search partners (like Yahoo and Bing), and could presumably wring more revenue from them if it offered to make one of them the default search provider for Firefox. And Mozilla hasn?t been letting efforts to solicit contributions slide: It has to receive at least 10 percent of its funding from public support to file as a publicly supported charity. In 2010, that proportion was a healthy 14.71 percent, accounting for $1.3 million from over 5,500 people. That?s a 500 percent increase from 2009, showing Mozilla is getting serious about raising revenue from public support rather than relying exclusively on search partnerships.

But the bottom line is that losing its search deal with Google would cause Mozilla to scramble to find new sources of revenue. The degree to which that would impact Mozilla?s development plans is unclear: The organization claims its software development and fundraising processes are separated. That means programmers wouldn?t be pulled out of code repositories to stand on street corners holding tin cups. But it?s hard to attract (and retain) solid software talent without financing. Over time, revenue shortages would have a negative impact on Mozilla development.

Google without Mozilla

Another way of looking at Mozilla?s situation is to ask: Does Google still need Mozilla? When Google and Mozilla entered into their first search arrangement five years ago, Internet Explorer was by far the market-dominant Web browser, and (of course) has always shipped with Microsoft?s search services set up as the default. Google?s interest in a search deal with Mozilla was to put Google services front and center in Firefox: as Firefox expanded its marketshare, it took Google services along with it.

However, things have changed since five years ago. Internet Explorer is still the world?s most popular browser by marketshare, but Google?s own Chrome is gaining fast: According to Irish tracking firm StatCounter, Chrome has already surpassed Firefox to become the second most-popular browser worldwide. StatCounter has Internet Explorer accounting for 40.63 percent of the global market; Chrome accounts for 25.69 percent and Firefox is at 25.23 percent.

Not all metrics firm agree with StatCounter: Net Applications has Chrome with a 18.18 percent share of the market in November, with Firefox accounting for a 22.14 percent share. However, if current trends hold, Chrome will overtake Firefox in Net Applications? analysis of the market by mid-2012.

Chrome is important in this equation because it ships with Google?s search services configured as the default. Back when Google made its search deal with Mozilla, it couldn?t compete with Internet Explorer with a browser of its own that had Google services set up as a default. Now it can.

Another arrow in Google?s quiver is that it can count on many Firefox users sticking with Google services even if Google were to abandon the search deal with Mozilla. After all, in the last five years Google has significantly expanded the suite of Web services it offers. Very few serious Internet users are completely independent of services like Gmail, Google Docs, YouTube ? heck, a few even use Google Plus. Google also now has years of experience convincing Internet Explorer users to switch away from Microsoft services to Google; it can apply the same techniques to Firefox.

Nonetheless, the worldwide expansion of the Internet means Mozilla is bringing more searchers to Google than ever before, and it?s reasonably certain Google doesn?t want to see those users driven to Bing. Now that Google has the number two (or number three) browser, those searchers from Firefox may not be as valuable to Google as they were five years ago, but they?re almost certainly worth something.

Firefox?s future

Mozilla?s search provider brouhaha has served to highlight the current dilemma of Firefox as a desktop browser. Mozilla has seen some success with its recent rapid-release development cycle, which so far has seen the company roll through Firefox 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 in 2011 alone. The release strategy has been touted as a way to get major changes to the browser out the door sooner, including performance and memory usage improvements as well as new features like tab groups, location support, the ability to opt out of Web tracking, improved add-on management, and more.

However, users have generally been underwhelmed and confused by the flurry of releases, especially since few bring high-profile new features that seem immediately useful. Instead, Firefox?s release schedule brings many users disruption and annoyance ? and let?s not forget enterprise users who don?t want to be put in a position of having to test and certify new browser releases every six weeks. While Mozilla is trying to move die-hards off old versions of Firefox 3.6 ? the last old-school release ? it also left many people behind who can?t upgrade. For instance, while Firefox will run on Windows XP, it doesn?t run on anything older than Mac OS X 10.5, leaving users of older Macs out in the cold.

Firefox also faces another challenge in that it?s a desktop app? and a lot of the Web browsing world is moving off desktop and notebook computers. Firefox has been working on mobile versions of its browser, but so far it isn?t even a blip on the mobile browsing radar. According to Net Applications, Apple?s Safari browser is over 55 percent of the mobile browsing market, with Opera Mini as its nearest competitor at 20.09 percent and the Android browser coming in with a 16.36 percent share. Firefox and Mozilla browsers total up to less than 0.04 percent. So far, Firefox hasn?t shown any convincing strategy to move forward into the mobile world ? and, ultimately, that may mean fewer people give Firefox much consideration on the desktop.

This article was originally posted on Digital Trends

More from Digital Trends

Google Chrome turns 15, Firefox goes Bing

Google Chrome overtakes Firefox in UK browser market

Internet Explorer users have lowest IQ of all web surfers, study shows [updated]

Mozilla spars with Microsoft over WebGL security

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/personaltech/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/digitaltrends/20111206/tc_digitaltrends/mozillasdelicatedancewithgoogle

winston churchill arkham city conjugated linoleic acid world series schedule apple earnings tampa weather pat buchanan